Comments on: Stopping The Cardinal Sin of Colocation Rack Power Sizing https://www.servethehome.com/stopping-the-cardinal-sin-of-colocation-rack-power-sizing-supermicro/ Server and Workstation Reviews Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:54:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Shaun McCloud https://www.servethehome.com/stopping-the-cardinal-sin-of-colocation-rack-power-sizing-supermicro/#comment-582968 Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:54:03 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79400#comment-582968 Having just gone through the fun time of finding a colo as we are vacating our office space with a server room, it is a pain going through and figuring out how much power you may need. Plus finding out there are 208v -> 120v isolation transformers for ancient equipment you need to buy.

]]>
By: Vlad D https://www.servethehome.com/stopping-the-cardinal-sin-of-colocation-rack-power-sizing-supermicro/#comment-582939 Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:17:44 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79400#comment-582939 Except for in many industries spikes are significantly correlated horizontally (multiple instances) and, to a lesser extent, vertically (multiple tiers often buffered by caches).

Think that financial markets activity is usually active in a large segment. A phenomenon may drive people from a region, stressing that region’s allocated rack. Etc. One does now simply advise to size down.

]]>
By: fuzzyfuzzyfungus https://www.servethehome.com/stopping-the-cardinal-sin-of-colocation-rack-power-sizing-supermicro/#comment-582926 Sun, 28 Jul 2024 21:28:50 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79400#comment-582926 I’d assume that a lot of colo setups either have somewhat limited sensitivity or just don’t want the customer dissatisfaction involved in deliberately tripping a metaphorical breaker just because someone momentarily drew more power than is budgeted, so you can probably get away with it a lot of the time; but are there any servers whose power management options include an “absolutely do not draw more than X watts, throttle whatever it takes” setting to make running your config close to the wire safer?

Obviously, if you are consistently throttling expensive silicon to save on (relatively) cheap colo power you are doing it wrong; but it’s not uncommon for there to be a worst-case configuration that exceeds the power draw of an expected workload(like the furmark case that the GPU companies kept whining about being a ‘power virus’ rather than an actual benchmark back in the day); and if you are trying to cut the margins nice and tight it would be reassuring to be able to instruct systems to simply refuse such cases.

On the other hand, that seems like it could turn into a real down-the-rabbit-hole if you’ve got a fairly heterogeneous collection of gear(it’s certainly much less exciting; both as hardware or in terms of power density than it used to be; but something like an HDD shelf deciding to do a full spin up is still a nontrivial swing in power usage and power usage that no one server’s BMC is necessarily going to be aware of); with systems needing to be aware of other systems’ power draws in order to determine what is safe at any given moment.

]]>
By: Joeri https://www.servethehome.com/stopping-the-cardinal-sin-of-colocation-rack-power-sizing-supermicro/#comment-582922 Sun, 28 Jul 2024 19:10:55 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79400#comment-582922 HPE and I think Dell as well have a website where you can calculate the actual power usage for your specific configuration.

]]>