Comments on: AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Delayed Due to Quality Concerns https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryzen-9000-series-delayed-due-to-quality-concerns/ Server and Workstation Reviews Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:15:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: lolcow https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryzen-9000-series-delayed-due-to-quality-concerns/#comment-582893 Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:15:05 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79366#comment-582893 Just wait until the previous commenter finds out about “all core boost” clocks.

]]>
By: MDF https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryzen-9000-series-delayed-due-to-quality-concerns/#comment-582801 Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:46:41 +0000 https://www.servethehome.com/?p=79366#comment-582801 I’m less concerned with absolute maximum boost clocks…the latest chips can’t sustain more than 1 core for more than a few seconds before throttling back from those peaks. It’s mostly useless at the edge like that.

All core boost clocks are more important, and base clocks on AMD are so far better than Intel to begin with, they don’t need to chase those peaks. An AMD 9950X runs 5.5-5.7 stable and Intel 14900ks (whatever that peak model is) runs 6ghz+ unstable it’s an obvious choice. The difference in benchmarks at this edge is <5% across every application. I really don't want AMD chasing intel down the hell-hole of hot cpu's pulling more wattage than a microwave. Intel has to do that because they are behind the curve in process maturity (still).

Base clocks on AMD are over 1GHZ higher than Intel. 4.4ghz base on a 9950x vs 3.2ghz on the i7-14900k and that exists across both companies lineups. I'd rather they got better binning and reliable clocks that chase the last few % points of winning. They already are imho. And competition is good.

]]>